| during a break in the symposium... |
|
 | So you don't accept that there is any objective reality? | |
|
| Yes and no. I, of course, operate as if there is one but I have yet to se any unassailable proof that one exists. To date any argument to the fact rests upon an assumption of Faith. Pretty much like any other religion. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What about the work of people like Einstein, Fenyman or even Wheeler? You can't seriously doubt their findings. | |
|
| Have you met any of them? Did you actually see them obtain their reported results? | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No. My mentor, Dr. Pangloss did research with Fenyman and he saw the results. Countless others have repeated their works and report the same results. | |
|
| So the basis of your argument is the faith you have that your mentor gave you accurate information and that said information in turn has some correspondence to an objective reality. | |
|
|
|
|
|
